The Impact of The Culture of Social Media Lynching on Users: A Netnographic Analysis on The X Application
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social media, while expanding freedom of expression and social participation, also paves the way for the spread of online violence and hate speech. In Turkey and across the world, individuals and groups with different ethnic, political, ideological, and religious identities are subjected to lynching attempts on social media, which deepens polarization and results in labeling and social exclusion. This study adopts a netnographic design to examine the impact of lynch culture on users’ emotional states and its relationship with depression on the X platform (formerly Twitter). Data were collected from publicly shared posts and responses around lynch-related hashtags/topics and trending events, with all content anonymized in line with ethical principles. The analysis was carried out using thematic content analysis and discourse analysis techniques. Findings were categorized into five clusters: (1) Those avoiding/hating lynching—users emphasized how herd-like repetition of aggressive discourse triggered withdrawal from the platform and self-censorship; (2) Those feeding on lynching—lynching was framed as a source of visibility and emotional arousal, functioning as an attention-seeking practice; (3) Those affected by lynching—experiences of diminished self-esteem, heightened anxiety, sleep problems, a turn toward anonymity, and the narrowing of actual freedom of expression; (4) Counter-defenders—users adopting a normative stance against hate speech, engaging in blocking/exposing practices, and calling for ethical communication; (5) Those seeking/explaining causes—lynching was linked to triggers such as over-interpretation of intent, low tolerance for mistakes, ideological blindness, and weak deterrents. Overall, the results demonstrate that lynch culture is fueled by digital visibility and group identity motivations, increasing depressive moods, stress, and social withdrawal risks among victims while producing fear and normalization effects even among passive audiences.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abbott, T. (2023). Linç tanımları üzerine. Journal of Social Studies, 45(2), ss. 134-145.
Allport, G. W. (1958). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
Aytaş, M. (2024). Ağ Toplumu ve Dijital Medyada Ontoloji, Zaman/Mekân Kavramlarını Yeniden Okumak. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 37(37), 399-409.
Balaban-Salı, J. (2012). Yeni medya ve toplumsal dönüşüm. Journal of Communication Studies, 23(4), ss. 290-300.
Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Causes and consequences of delegitimization: Models of conflict and ethnocentrism. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), ss. 65-81.
Bilen, H., Ercan, T. ve Gülmez, T. (2014). Sosyal ağlar üzerine bir inceleme. Aktaran: Erçolak, B. (2017). Sosyal ağların etkileri. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 16(2), ss. 3-15.
Brewer, M. B. ve Crano, W. D. (1994). Social psychology: Principles and themes. In J. Smith (Ed.), Group dynamics (ss. 45-67). Oxford University Press.
Canetti, E. (2010). Kitle ve iktidar. Çev. M. S. Çavuş. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Çebi, A. ve Akıllı, N. (2021). Dijitalleşme ve sosyal medya etkileri. Yeni Medya Araştırmaları, 12(1), ss. 5-20.
Duman, T. (2019). Yeni medya teknolojilerinin etkileri. Journal of Digital Transformation, 7(3), ss. 4-10.
Erçolak, B. (2017). Sosyal medya platformları ve toplumsal etkileri. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19(3), ss. 5-10.
Freud, S. (1975). Toplumsal kuram ve birey. Çev. A. İlhan. Metis Yayınları.
Gambetti, Z. (2007). Linç ve toplumsal şiddet. Toplum ve Bilim, 109, ss. 31-45.
Gasset, J. O. (1992). Kitlelerin ayaklanışı. Çev. E. Altan. İletişim Yayınları.
Gökalp, S. (2022). Dijitalleşme ve nefret söylemleri. Yeni Medya Dergisi, 15(2), ss. 117-123.
Hayes, M. (2016). Kitle psikolojisi üzerine. Journal of Behavioral Studies, 33(4), ss. 201-215.
İnceoğlu, M. ve Sözeri, C. (2012). Hoşgörüsüzlük üzerine. Toplum ve İletişim Dergisi, 8(1), ss. 45-58.
Kozinets, R. V. (2006). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnografi ve sosyal medya araştırmaları. Çev. Y. Acar. Yeni Medya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), ss. 93-99.
Kuçuradi, İ. (2011). İnsan hakları: Kavramlar ve sorunlar. Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu.
NAACP. (2022). What constitutes lynching. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Reports.
Öztürk, A. (2023). Dijital toplum ve sosyal medya. Sosyal Bilimler Yayınları.
Peretti, P. (2006). Linç kültürü ve hukuk. Aktaran: Paker, H. (2006). Toplumsal adalet ve linç. Toplum ve Hukuk Dergisi, 12(1), ss. 25-32.
Püsküllüoğlu, A. (2012). Linç ve toplumsal yansımaları. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 21(2), ss. 45-51.
Şen, E. ve Akgül, Y. (2023). Dijital nefret söylemleri ve etkileri. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları, 14(2), ss. 99-106.
Türk, E. (2017). Sosyal medya motivasyonları. İletişim Araştırmaları, 22(3), ss. 460-465.
Vural, Z. B. ve Bat, M. (2010). Yeni medya platformları üzerine bir inceleme. İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 18(2), ss. 23-34.
Yılmaz, E. (2013). Ayrımcılık ve dışlama üzerine. Toplum ve İnsan Hakları Dergisi, 11(3), ss. 45-55.
Yücel, A. (2014). Şiddet ve sosyal dinamikler. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 20(1), ss. 23-40.